I love summer, and now that OCF is wrapped, it is my time for summer projects. I got to most of the garlic just in time, but still have tons of weeding to do and have to restore my raspberry patch this year in the process. I just want to be outside all of the time, no matter how hot it is.
At the same time, my body is telling me my ambitions are too high. I still hurt in several places from all of the work of Fair, and haven't gone out to clean up my site yet, which I really need to do this week. As it involves lifting wood, I'm dreading it a bit. The site after the event is always so dried out, beaten down and hard-used, it makes me vow to go out more when it is fresh, watered, and lush. Spring flowers are incredible there. I absolutely must spread out my work there too, as trying to do all the set-up in two days was just way too hard this year.
Market is barely manageable, as my new shoes didn't prove to be miracle-working, as I'd hoped. The foot I broke 13 years ago is showing me its longterm conditions for use, and I am not catching on to the adaptions I'm having to make. I simply cannot stand all day long so will need a high stool to sit on, so I can still be at customer eye level but able to rest the foot. Of course that won't help the back problems, or the other things I need to accommodate, but I'm hoping my new improved attitude will allow a bit less avoidance and a bit more realistic change.
Meanwhile, avoidance of Market politics isn't working as things get more toxic. More members are becoming targets of harassment for what is essentially questioning the decisions of the power structure, which are being delivered in a "if you disagree there is something wrong with you" manner. We no longer have a consensus-seeking process, we have an in-group agreement to push aside anyone who represents a different opinion, and this has spread to many topics, but it's most egregious when it comes to the efforts to make all members comply with all "guidelines" which are no longer suggestions for best practices but laws with "consequences" attached and control and domination tactics employed to get compliance. Humiliation at the hands of your fellow equal members is becoming common.
Numerous members have been labeled "mentally ill" or "disturbed" if they persist in making their disagreements known. I remember when I first sensed I was put in that category, and it was subtle but twisted. An angry person had dropped his suitcase near my booth, but I hadn't heard him say something threatening about it. All I saw was a suitcase in the aisle so I moved it to the corner out of the way. The story came back to me as something that had been chuckled about, that in a ditzy way, I had acted just like a silly old woman would have, and that was so endearing. I do not find my characterization as a silly old woman endearing. I think I have proven that I am a sharp, critically thinking and extremely capable seasoned person, and any diminution of my personal power is a calculated robbery of my standing and effectiveness as a member. That was just the tip of an iceberg as it turned out.
The tactic of labeling someone as disturbed or crazy is super effective when people don't have direct experience with that person, but place their faith in the opinion of someone in power. It is being used to prepare others to take punitive action against another member, piling up "evidence" carefully to destroy that person's credibility and warp their actions into something suspicious or threatening. Evidence includes people you are seen speaking with, (you must be conspiring, even though you are maybe talking about your products or anything, even the weather), offhand remarks taken out of context, comments you might have made in person or on social media that could have been meant in completely different ways, such as jokes, and infractions you might have made against the many rules. Or you squinting into the sun in the direction of someone who takes offense and sees you as casting the evil eye on them. Any action or statement is fair game.
I used to say that we all had that one rule we didn't follow, but now that might be used in a list of things you do to oppose management control. I don't joke about that now. Our traditional freedom to retain some independence as individual business owners is being taken as some kind of disloyalty that makes us dangerous to the org. There is only one allowed position and that is to support the management in every decision and intent.
This is of course resulting in a visible lack of volunteers and support for organizational efforts. No one wants that Secretary job, which involves responsibility and a close working relationship with the GM. No one wants to be on the committees where the atmosphere is highly controlled and not collaborative. There's some idea that everything has to be unanimous as if different opinions were destructive or dangerous. Hey, votes have three cateories...approve, disapprove, stand aside. All valid and all helpful in getting to the "elegant solutions" that work the best.
The scariest part is the punishment era we are in where members build cases to terminate the memberships of their equals. When disagreement is a threat, and members are labeled as "unmanageable" it is seen as acceptable to take away their access to the community, the opportunity to make their livings, and to ban them from the marketplace. I don't see how any member can do this without that gut feeling that they themselves could be next. This has never been part of our culture. Someone would have to actually commit a dangerous crime to have their membership taken away. We have always maintained that our diversity is our strength, and that lots of different opinions, styles, and ways to be creative were acceptable and desired, to keep us lively, accessible, and thriving. Conformity has never been something we imposed or even saw as necessary to begin with.
But every kind of diversity is threatening to this power structure. If domination and control tactics don't work, those with voting power are told false narratives about people being unmanageable, dangerous, and necessary to remove for the protection of the GM. Instead of having someone able to do many types of management that would be effective, when her tactics don't work, she constructs a case that no one could do better and removal of the offender is the only solution.
I want an end to termination of membership as a possibility while this is dealt with as a negative aspect of our current structure that will destroy us. It is seriously offensive. It is authoritarian and seeing otherwise reasonable people engage in these actions is so very demoralizing. No one is safe from this.
I do not feel safe at Market, not safe to engage in my longterm friendships, to express my opinions, to engage in any market dialogues or online discussions, not safe to pose solutions or questions, not safe to write this essay. I know there is already a case against me, though it hasn't been documented with Notices of Concern yet or whatever might be in store for me. Ask yourself if someone in their 50th year of participation, having always acted in responsibility and service, feels threatened, what must someone new be feeling? The scrutiny is always there. I am being watched. I'm being judged by my associations, perceived attitudes, sharing observations, attempting to point things out that go against our shared values.
And if I am, so are you. Is this what you want every week when you show up? Do you feel like an outsider while you see an in-group rejecting other equal members? Are you preferring silence to looking for solutions?
I don't know how to fix this. I'm working on it. But I do know that I am not crazy, and my observations are not because I am mentally ill...and neither are yours. Take heart. Truth and justice are powerful and they won't hide.