I went and listened to the 2.5 hour Board meeting of the OCF because they had a contentious issue regarding appointment of a Board member to fill a seat opened by the death of one. I had to catch up on a lot of passionate and very considered statements from members, seated Board members, and the Membership Secretary, who resigned after writing a letter in the Fair Family News about this process.
Records showed that over the last decade, appointments had not been made mid-term for many other resignations, in fact, no appointments had been made or even discussed. This is obviously not about the person the Board wanted to appoint, who did get the highest votes under the election threshold in the fall election. However, the next person was only 2 votes behind, and they split on several positions. It's a bylaws procedure to appoint, but it hasn't been done in the past because the membership is so passionately concerned about their membership rights and past Boards have supported respecting the members choices. But the power structure really wanted to do this one. And succeeded. And spent most of two hours deciding the question.
The OCF has a 13-person Board, and can operate just fine with 11 or 12 members. There is an election every October that hundreds of members participate in (over seven hundred.) For many this is a very concerning erosion of member rights. The OCF also has a somewhat hidden political party that supports the current power structure. The vast numbers of people who do not support this party and power structure have been besieged with oppressive policy changes and lack of transparency in the years since this party politics developed. I have personally received emails lobbying for certain candidates and disparaging others. This is highly unethical, and many people who should know better have participated in that effort to sway voters in non-public ways, which is also offensive and if not blatantly illegal, it's highly suspect.
The Membership Secretary resigned over this appointment issue. Anytime an officer resigns over ethical concerns, it is a huge red flag for the organization. Perception is everything in a membership org. They've gone through three membership secretaries in the past two years, all highly qualified and dedicated to service. That red flag is getting bigger and waving wildly.
I'm looking at you, Saturday Market. When I resigned for ethical reasons in August 2024, I did not use my soapbox to explain it, for fear of further breaking what I felt was in a fragile state. I view that lack of a statement as a personal failure at this point, but I did what I thought was best and tried not to make things about me. I doubt it would have changed anything that's happening now, if I had spoken up. But I should have, except I was convinced that no one would listen or want to hear my opinion. I fell for some gaslighting and manipulation. But that's a different story in most ways. They do also have a narcissist in a power position, though.
We have the luxury of watching zoom recordings of the OCF Board meetings. It's a great way to watch directors in action and form your own opinions about what's going on, as well as get vital information for your own informed participation. I was against the recordings when they began, but for the 501c3 that they are, it's at this point, vital that they hold onto this transparency. It has helped them avoid a lot of mistakes. They still have a lot of problems, and I won't really elaborate on them at this time. You can go and watch a few meetings for yourself.
For market, member rights and transparency barely exist right now. I know of several Committee reports and minutes that have never been shared. I've waited in vain for even attendance at committee meetings; I don't even know who is on committees right now. This means I have no way to effectively communicate with these committees and members, outside of attending in person, which I won't do due to the toxic atmosphere of the office and power structure for me.
I've heard rumors of a ruling that will affect me...I don't feel confident I will even be notified if it comes up. I know of many things that have been done and not done which are at best, ill-advised. I've seen election interference by officers, staff, and other members, that was at best, unethical, and at worst, illegal. I'm glad I resigned when I did, but there has not been an effective and thorough Secretary since, which has been a great loss to the organization. The Board needs to address all of the root causes of this situation, but as far as I know from the minutes, they haven't. The most recent proposal was just to strip out all the oversight and parliamentary responsibilities of the position so someone would take it. Maybe you can imagine how that hits me.
People have to remember how hierarchies work. Those at the top will deny that they hold positions of power at the top of the hierarchy. They don't see anyone beneath them. All of the many people who are beneath them do see it, clearly, and attempt to fight for their equal rights, usually to the derision of the people at the top. Membership organizations are not supposed to be hierarchical. All members are equal members. Positions of responsibility are about service, not power. This is essential to maintain.
I know I, and others I served with, understood this and refused privilege or any ways we were treated as having any advantage from our positions. We didn't want points, we didn't want special favors, or to be seen as a member of a special group. That stance seems to have left our organizational values. We see quite a lot of favoritism. Of the three committee chairs who resigned their positions recently, only one was remarked upon, and repeatedly praised for her whole two years of service.
The lead professional is supposed to learn about the legalities, foster Board education and support the Board and Committee volunteers to do their jobs well and serve with honor and pride in their work. Not pride in their positions...their service. What progress they are able to produce and nurture together. For the organization, and for the members who placed their trust in them. Not for the benefit of the power structure. Not to "support the staff."
We just don't have that in place anymore. It's a huge loss, and until we restore some trust we will not see people step up for positions of responsibility. We have to do better. We have to do our best. And like OCF, we have to have an atmosphere where member rights are honored, supported, and held up by both the members and the power structure. We are supposed to be working together. We are not supposed to be in a situation laced with oppression, retaliation, and fear.
You can watch the meeting here.